Welcome to Stuart Fernie’s Blog
Reflections on a variety of films and topics - Seven Samurai, It's a Wonderful Life, Don Quixote, We're no angels, War for the planet of the apes, Dunkirk, The African Queen, Babette's Feast, Dances with Wolves, The Prisoner (1967), Inherit the wind, humour in drama, nature of regret, the influence of multimedia, memoirs of a teacher of French.
Friday, 31 October 2025
Introduction
Reflections on characters and themes in “Prime Cut”
Reflections
on “Prime Cut”
Directed
by Michael Ritchie
Script
by Robert Dillon
Starring
Lee Marvin, Gene Hackman and Sissy Spacek
Dismissed by many as
quirky, violent or outlandish, “Prime Cut” delivers a neo-noir gangster
thriller cum fairytale that mixes satire with thrills while playing with conventions,
both cinematic and fairytale, and makes points about society which remain
remarkably relevant even more than fifty years after its release.
Kansas gangster Mary Ann has borrowed half a million dollars from the Chicago mob and he refuses to repay his debt, resulting in the violent deaths of several envoys dispatched to recover the money and then the hiring of enforcer Nick Devlin by Chicago to recoup their money or inflict punishment on Mary Ann.
It is worth noting that
traditional law enforcement plays no part in the proceedings and we are clearly
in film noir territory with neither of the rival groups respecting law and
order. There are, however, distinct differences between the two camps. The
Chicago city “mob” is polite and maintains a veneer of respectability and
decorum that distracts from the criminal nature of their activities. They
appear to recognise they are dependent on fundamental public freedoms and
rights if their hustles and scams are to be effective. They may be a criminal
enterprise but they are business-like, organised and focused on financial gain,
not exploitation or dominion.
On the other hand, Mary
Ann’s rural Kansas crew is narcissistic, unsophisticated, lawless and casually
disregards values and humanity as, among many other nefarious activities and
actions, they treat young women like cattle to be sold into prostitution or
sexual abuse to the highest bidder at auction.
And so we have two levels
of corruption and amorality – in the city, the gangsters depend on a prosperous
and relatively healthy and happy society to make money, while in the country,
the gangsters have lost sight of consideration and respect and are devoted to
self-indulgence and profit at the expense of others.
Nick Devlin is no angel.
He is a man capable of amoral acts, especially when dealing with amoral people,
and he is willing to make those who deserve it, suffer. However, as is so often
the case in film noir, an apparently amoral agent can have his conscience or
idealistic side awakened and be led to demonstrate compassion and
understanding, showing humanity and hope.
Devlin meets Mary Ann and
threateningly demands repayment of Chicago’s money but he is touched by the
innocence and predicament of Poppy who is to be sold into prostitution or
sexual abuse by the heartless Mary Ann and Devlin takes her away with him, “on
account”.
Devlin treats Poppy with
kindness and respect and this is a key element of the film. He is willing to
accept and live by amoral standards and can operate on the same level as his
opponents to regulate matters, yet he is willing to help those innocents who
are victimised by these amoral standards. He is thus an unexpected and dubious
hero as he discovers or reveals his humanity and the limits to his amoral
conduct.
Indeed, with regard to
the “fairytale” aspect of the film, Devlin may even be viewed as something of a
“white knight” as his light grey suits (and white shoes at one point), elevate
him above the level of his well-dressed colleagues and contrast with the casual
and slovenly appearance of his opponents. These suits may even suggest armour and
relative purity and nobility of purpose as he attacks the lair of the “villain”
and saves the innocent maiden. I should point out that many of the original
versions of fairytales were far more brutal than the sanitised forms we have
come to expect, and included violence, rape and murder, so perhaps the gap
between a fairytale and film noir is not so great after all…
Fundamentally, as a
neo-noir fairytale, the film needs a heroic aspect because otherwise there
would be little interest in simply watching two groups of amoral characters
fight it out amid what would be pointless action sequences with continued and
unchanged amorality as the end result. This way, in keeping with the age-old
conventions of storytelling, we have someone to root for and a principle to
believe in as Devlin’s outlook is challenged and his humanity is awakened. Our
sullied hero defends principle and he destroys an evil organisation, though
this also happens to suit the purposes of his amoral employers…
The depiction of the
Chicago gangsters may also be viewed as reflecting aspects of shady modern
business dealings in which the veneer of respectability and decorum conceals a
grimy, threatening and underhand mentality with businesses and CEOs willing to
use others to maximise profit with a minimum of honest effort.
Equally, the depiction of
the environment in which the Kansas gangsters and Mary Ann operate may resonate
with some present-day audiences as those living in and around Mary Ann’s field
of influence seem willing to turn a blind eye to or wilfully misconstrue his
misdeeds, manipulation and crass determination to have his own way. Even the
apparently outlandish and horrifying auction of young women for immoral
purposes has found vague parallels in modern times…
Clearly, the society
presented in the film is male-dominated and women are treated largely as
objects of pleasure or abuse, but the film does offer a glimmer of hope in that
Poppie is liberated and is shown respect, and she and Devlin go on to free the
young ladies in the orphanage, ending on a note of optimism and contributing to
the modern fairytale quality of the film.
I regard “Prime Cut” as
flawed but involving and thoroughly enjoyable. The combination of film noir and
fairytale is intriguing but isn’t easy to achieve and it’s probably better not
to think too hard about inconsistencies in characterisation, plot and tone.
Better to just enjoy the emotional engagement, the playful and daring
combination of noir and fairytale, and especially the performances of Lee
Marvin, Gene Hackman and Sissy Spacek who carry the film and allow it to
transcend what may be viewed as its imperfections.
My thanks for taking the
time to read this article. I hope you found it of some value.
Stuart Fernie (stuartfernie@yahoo.co.uk)
Thursday, 16 October 2025
Characters and themes in David Lean’s “Hobson’s Choice”
Reflections
on “Hobson’s Choice”
Directed
by David Lean
Screenplay
by David Lean, Norman Spencer and Wynard Browne
Based
on the play by Harold Brighouse
Starring
Charles Laughton, John Mills and Brenda de Banzie
“Hobson’s Choice” is a
deceptively simple tale which manages to say a great deal about the historical place
of women in society (contrasting with their true value) and the nature of
successful relationships in terms of marriage and business. It is a light-hearted
drama or affectionate satire which mocks and gently derides the capitalist and patriarchal
Victorian society of the late 1800s, or indeed any society in which figures of
authority exploit or abuse their staff or families, yet are dependent on their
efforts for their own wealth and success.
The main character,
bootmaker Henry Hobson, displays a haughty disregard for his employees whose
skills and efforts are requisite to and underpin his business, and this
attitude extends to the exploitation of his three daughters on whom he depends for
the successful running of his commercial interests but whose lives, careers and
loves are sacrificed to the maintenance of his own position and comfort. Henry
is somewhat selfish and self-indulgent, and refuses to recognise the essential
contribution made by oldest daughter Maggie to the success of his business,
except in the company of friends to whom he confides that she is too useful to
lose.
His two younger daughters
are keen to marry and have families of their own, principally to escape the
family home, but Maggie, insulted by her father’s dismissal of her marriage
prospects at the ripe old age of thirty, is driven not just to choose a partner
in life but also to teach her father a lesson in commerce and in parenting.
Apart
from presenting a decidedly feminist approach, playwright Brighouse and
director Lean also use this tale to explore the dawn of self-respect and
self-worth in the working classes whose skilled labour played an essential part
in the success of middle-class businesses. Will Mossop, Hobson’s highly
talented but taken for granted bootmaker is taught self-esteem, the value of merited
respect and eventually love by Maggie who sees his potential as a business and
life partner. It appears that marriage may be viewed not just as an idealistic
union of love-crossed individuals, but perhaps as a commercial partnership or
means of escape from social expectation to build one’s own life. As is so often
the case in stories of this nature, Will evolves as a result of Maggie’s
tutelage and interest – he requires her steady and intelligent vision to help
him fulfil his potential, but the consequences are mutually beneficial and
their relationship develops into a true, equal and loving partnership.
Given Henry’s apparent
slide into alcoholism and his attitudes, it struck me that he couldn’t have
built a successful business with such an outlook, and then I remembered his
wife died some years before. Could it be that his wife directed him in the same
way that Maggie will guide Will, and after her death Henry became a little
lost? His dependence on Maggie may reflect a similar dependence on his wife,
though, as with Maggie, he would never have admitted it. That would also
explain where Maggie gets her strength and determination from. Of course, the
two younger sisters don’t show the same characteristics but maybe that’s
because Maggie was older and had more time with her mother.
The film is made very
much in the style of gentle British social comedies of the time (the 1950s) and
is vaguely reminiscent of the style of Molière, the 17th century
French comic playwright who more or less invented comedic drama, specialising
in making serious points but using comedy rather than melodrama to make them.
Instead of inviting anger and indignation at the situations of the “victims”,
Brighouse and Lean make the antagonist the butt of humour and mockery while also
gently pointing out Will’s foibles, evolution and fulfilment in the hands of
the feminist and intelligent Maggie.
Presenting
the drama in this way has the effect of “battling from within” as the audience
is invited to recognise character strengths and weaknesses in a familiar and
engaging way rather than through dramatic extremes of unfamiliar and
exaggerated conflict and are therefore more likely to find it persuasive and
appealing. Essentially, comedy undermines while drama attacks.
The
comic tone of the piece is set from the very start with Malcolm Arnold’s
oh-so-catchy and comical theme tune – the audience knows instantly what tone to
expect and this is confirmed by Laughton’s playing for laughs. We are being
invited to relax and enjoy Brighouse and Lean’s pertinent observations on
society without tension, anxiety or melodrama.
That
said, the film makes serious points about the role of women in the structure of
society and in inspiring people (usually men) to achieve their potential.
Maggie is the backbone of her father’s business but, in keeping with the
position of women in society at that time, she received little or no
recognition for it. Her strength, determination and love inspire Will to
achieve far more than he would ever have done without her influence, yet she
would never have done so well without Will, either. She is the spirit while he
is the practical, and together they make a whole, yet her attitude seems to soften
as Will becomes more assertive and independent. Perhaps respect and affection
are augmented by pride as she sees the results of her labours.
As
a result of Maggie’s cunning intervention, Henry is left with no real choice
and is forced to provide financial settlements for his younger daughters’
marriages, and to recognise the value of Will’s contribution to his business.
With Will, he forms what amounts to a commercial union between capitalist
management and skilled workforce, with each element receiving recognition for
the value of their input. Perhaps Brighouse saw this formula as something
business ventures across the country could aspire to…
Sharply and knowingly directed
by David Lean, “Hobson’s Choice” is beautifully acted by all involved but
particular credit must go to Charles Laughton who manages to maintain audience sympathy
for the very character who is also the target of derision, and John Mills who
conveys innocence, vulnerability and nascent self-respect with consummate ease
and charm.
My thanks for taking the
time to read this article. I hope you found it of some value.
Stuart Fernie (stuartfernie@yahoo.co.uk)










