Friday, 31 October 2025

Introduction

                             Welcome to Stuart Fernie’s Blog



Please scroll down or find on the right links to articles, pages of reflections on films and books, and occasional pieces of short fiction.

Articles include discussion of "Prime Cut", the influence of existentialism in society today, anxiety, professional criteria and essential attributes in teaching, professionalism versus careerism, thoughts on the meaning of "success" and "worth", "Hobson's Choice", "Quai des Orfèvres", "Le Corbeau", "The Wages of Fear", advice and questions to assist in the writing of essays about films, thoughts on Proportion and Self-respect, "The Offence", "Trainspotting", "Three Days of the Condor", "Spotlight", "Good Night and Good Luck", "The Count of Monte Cristo" (French version, 2024), "Midnight Express", Jason Bourne, Advocating Arts and Humanities, "Heaven's Gate", "Civil War", "The Ghost and Mrs Muir", "Ad Astra", Duality in 19th century literature, "Living", "Hell in the Pacific", "Point Blank", "Vera Cruz", "Dr Strange in the Multiverse", my interpretation of "Il faut cultiver notre jardin", "Jean de Florette" and "Manon des Sources", "Drive my car", "The Batman", the place of acting in society, thoughts about religion and fate, "The Banshees of Inisherin", "Full Metal Jacket", "The Bishop's Wife", "Moliere", "Les Fleurs du Mal", "Soylent Green", "Bad Day at Black Rock", "The First Great Train Robbery", The Dreyfus Affair, "Persona", "The Seventh Seal", "A Clockwork Orange", "Night Moves", "Lonely are the Brave", "In the heat of the night", "The League of Gentlemen" (1960), thoughts on the nature of film noir, "Star Trek", "Seven Days in May", "Dead Poets Society", "Good Will Hunting", "Callan", "The Hill", "Cool Hand Luke", "The Hustler", "Road to Perdition", "The Verdict", "Three Colour Trilogy", "Jojo Rabbit", "Jeremiah Johnson", "Collateral", "Joker", "Barry Lyndon", "The Bridge at Remagen", "Le Mans '66 (Ford v Ferrari)", Charles Foster Kane ("Citizen Kane"), "The Deer Hunter", "Highlander", "No Country for Old Men", "Gattaca", "The Adventures of Robin Hood"(1938), "Apocalypse Now", "Spartacus", "The Bridge on the River Kwai", "The Long Good Friday", "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood", "The Third Man", "Finding Forrester", "The Outlaw Josey Wales", "Untouchable" (2011),"Unforgiven", "The Manchurian Candidate", "The Wild Bunch", "The Treasure of the Sierra Madre", "Papillon" (1973), "Public Eye", "Existentialism in society today", "Seven Samurai", "It's a Wonderful Life", "Don Quixote", "We're No Angels", "The African Queen", "Babette's Feast", "War for the Planet of the Apes", "Dunkirk", “Dances With Wolves”, “Inherit The Wind” and “The Prisoner”. 

link to my YouTube channel with video presentations of a number of my pages.

After I retired from teaching, I thought I’d write my memoirs, “What have I done?”, and present them online. Please find links to these memoirs, some French support pages and reflections on "Les Misérables" below.


I can be contacted through the comments sections or at stuartfernie@yahoo.co.uk

Other blogs available:








All intellectual property rights reserved

Reflections on characters and themes in “Prime Cut”

 

Reflections on “Prime Cut”

Directed by Michael Ritchie

Script by Robert Dillon

Starring Lee Marvin, Gene Hackman and Sissy Spacek

Dismissed by many as quirky, violent or outlandish, “Prime Cut” delivers a neo-noir gangster thriller cum fairytale that mixes satire with thrills while playing with conventions, both cinematic and fairytale, and makes points about society which remain remarkably relevant even more than fifty years after its release.

Kansas gangster Mary Ann has borrowed half a million dollars from the Chicago mob and he refuses to repay his debt, resulting in the violent deaths of several envoys dispatched to recover the money and then the hiring of enforcer Nick Devlin by Chicago to recoup their money or inflict punishment on Mary Ann.

It is worth noting that traditional law enforcement plays no part in the proceedings and we are clearly in film noir territory with neither of the rival groups respecting law and order. There are, however, distinct differences between the two camps. The Chicago city “mob” is polite and maintains a veneer of respectability and decorum that distracts from the criminal nature of their activities. They appear to recognise they are dependent on fundamental public freedoms and rights if their hustles and scams are to be effective. They may be a criminal enterprise but they are business-like, organised and focused on financial gain, not exploitation or dominion.

On the other hand, Mary Ann’s rural Kansas crew is narcissistic, unsophisticated, lawless and casually disregards values and humanity as, among many other nefarious activities and actions, they treat young women like cattle to be sold into prostitution or sexual abuse to the highest bidder at auction.

And so we have two levels of corruption and amorality – in the city, the gangsters depend on a prosperous and relatively healthy and happy society to make money, while in the country, the gangsters have lost sight of consideration and respect and are devoted to self-indulgence and profit at the expense of others.

Nick Devlin is no angel. He is a man capable of amoral acts, especially when dealing with amoral people, and he is willing to make those who deserve it, suffer. However, as is so often the case in film noir, an apparently amoral agent can have his conscience or idealistic side awakened and be led to demonstrate compassion and understanding, showing humanity and hope.

Devlin meets Mary Ann and threateningly demands repayment of Chicago’s money but he is touched by the innocence and predicament of Poppy who is to be sold into prostitution or sexual abuse by the heartless Mary Ann and Devlin takes her away with him, “on account”.

Devlin treats Poppy with kindness and respect and this is a key element of the film. He is willing to accept and live by amoral standards and can operate on the same level as his opponents to regulate matters, yet he is willing to help those innocents who are victimised by these amoral standards. He is thus an unexpected and dubious hero as he discovers or reveals his humanity and the limits to his amoral conduct.

Indeed, with regard to the “fairytale” aspect of the film, Devlin may even be viewed as something of a “white knight” as his light grey suits (and white shoes at one point), elevate him above the level of his well-dressed colleagues and contrast with the casual and slovenly appearance of his opponents.  These suits may even suggest armour and relative purity and nobility of purpose as he attacks the lair of the “villain” and saves the innocent maiden. I should point out that many of the original versions of fairytales were far more brutal than the sanitised forms we have come to expect, and included violence, rape and murder, so perhaps the gap between a fairytale and film noir is not so great after all…

Fundamentally, as a neo-noir fairytale, the film needs a heroic aspect because otherwise there would be little interest in simply watching two groups of amoral characters fight it out amid what would be pointless action sequences with continued and unchanged amorality as the end result. This way, in keeping with the age-old conventions of storytelling, we have someone to root for and a principle to believe in as Devlin’s outlook is challenged and his humanity is awakened. Our sullied hero defends principle and he destroys an evil organisation, though this also happens to suit the purposes of his amoral employers…

The depiction of the Chicago gangsters may also be viewed as reflecting aspects of shady modern business dealings in which the veneer of respectability and decorum conceals a grimy, threatening and underhand mentality with businesses and CEOs willing to use others to maximise profit with a minimum of honest effort.

Equally, the depiction of the environment in which the Kansas gangsters and Mary Ann operate may resonate with some present-day audiences as those living in and around Mary Ann’s field of influence seem willing to turn a blind eye to or wilfully misconstrue his misdeeds, manipulation and crass determination to have his own way. Even the apparently outlandish and horrifying auction of young women for immoral purposes has found vague parallels in modern times…

Clearly, the society presented in the film is male-dominated and women are treated largely as objects of pleasure or abuse, but the film does offer a glimmer of hope in that Poppie is liberated and is shown respect, and she and Devlin go on to free the young ladies in the orphanage, ending on a note of optimism and contributing to the modern fairytale quality of the film.

I regard “Prime Cut” as flawed but involving and thoroughly enjoyable. The combination of film noir and fairytale is intriguing but isn’t easy to achieve and it’s probably better not to think too hard about inconsistencies in characterisation, plot and tone. Better to just enjoy the emotional engagement, the playful and daring combination of noir and fairytale, and especially the performances of Lee Marvin, Gene Hackman and Sissy Spacek who carry the film and allow it to transcend what may be viewed as its imperfections.

 

My thanks for taking the time to read this article. I hope you found it of some value.

Stuart Fernie (stuartfernie@yahoo.co.uk)

 

BLOG                                                   YouTube

Thursday, 16 October 2025

Characters and themes in David Lean’s “Hobson’s Choice”

 

Reflections on “Hobson’s Choice”

Directed by David Lean

Screenplay by David Lean, Norman Spencer and Wynard Browne

Based on the play by Harold Brighouse

Starring Charles Laughton, John Mills and Brenda de Banzie

 


“Hobson’s Choice” is a deceptively simple tale which manages to say a great deal about the historical place of women in society (contrasting with their true value) and the nature of successful relationships in terms of marriage and business. It is a light-hearted drama or affectionate satire which mocks and gently derides the capitalist and patriarchal Victorian society of the late 1800s, or indeed any society in which figures of authority exploit or abuse their staff or families, yet are dependent on their efforts for their own wealth and success.

The main character, bootmaker Henry Hobson, displays a haughty disregard for his employees whose skills and efforts are requisite to and underpin his business, and this attitude extends to the exploitation of his three daughters on whom he depends for the successful running of his commercial interests but whose lives, careers and loves are sacrificed to the maintenance of his own position and comfort. Henry is somewhat selfish and self-indulgent, and refuses to recognise the essential contribution made by oldest daughter Maggie to the success of his business, except in the company of friends to whom he confides that she is too useful to lose.

His two younger daughters are keen to marry and have families of their own, principally to escape the family home, but Maggie, insulted by her father’s dismissal of her marriage prospects at the ripe old age of thirty, is driven not just to choose a partner in life but also to teach her father a lesson in commerce and in parenting.

Apart from presenting a decidedly feminist approach, playwright Brighouse and director Lean also use this tale to explore the dawn of self-respect and self-worth in the working classes whose skilled labour played an essential part in the success of middle-class businesses. Will Mossop, Hobson’s highly talented but taken for granted bootmaker is taught self-esteem, the value of merited respect and eventually love by Maggie who sees his potential as a business and life partner. It appears that marriage may be viewed not just as an idealistic union of love-crossed individuals, but perhaps as a commercial partnership or means of escape from social expectation to build one’s own life. As is so often the case in stories of this nature, Will evolves as a result of Maggie’s tutelage and interest – he requires her steady and intelligent vision to help him fulfil his potential, but the consequences are mutually beneficial and their relationship develops into a true, equal and loving partnership.

Given Henry’s apparent slide into alcoholism and his attitudes, it struck me that he couldn’t have built a successful business with such an outlook, and then I remembered his wife died some years before. Could it be that his wife directed him in the same way that Maggie will guide Will, and after her death Henry became a little lost? His dependence on Maggie may reflect a similar dependence on his wife, though, as with Maggie, he would never have admitted it. That would also explain where Maggie gets her strength and determination from. Of course, the two younger sisters don’t show the same characteristics but maybe that’s because Maggie was older and had more time with her mother.

The film is made very much in the style of gentle British social comedies of the time (the 1950s) and is vaguely reminiscent of the style of Molière, the 17th century French comic playwright who more or less invented comedic drama, specialising in making serious points but using comedy rather than melodrama to make them. Instead of inviting anger and indignation at the situations of the “victims”, Brighouse and Lean make the antagonist the butt of humour and mockery while also gently pointing out Will’s foibles, evolution and fulfilment in the hands of the feminist and intelligent Maggie.

Presenting the drama in this way has the effect of “battling from within” as the audience is invited to recognise character strengths and weaknesses in a familiar and engaging way rather than through dramatic extremes of unfamiliar and exaggerated conflict and are therefore more likely to find it persuasive and appealing. Essentially, comedy undermines while drama attacks.

The comic tone of the piece is set from the very start with Malcolm Arnold’s oh-so-catchy and comical theme tune – the audience knows instantly what tone to expect and this is confirmed by Laughton’s playing for laughs. We are being invited to relax and enjoy Brighouse and Lean’s pertinent observations on society without tension, anxiety or melodrama.

That said, the film makes serious points about the role of women in the structure of society and in inspiring people (usually men) to achieve their potential. Maggie is the backbone of her father’s business but, in keeping with the position of women in society at that time, she received little or no recognition for it. Her strength, determination and love inspire Will to achieve far more than he would ever have done without her influence, yet she would never have done so well without Will, either. She is the spirit while he is the practical, and together they make a whole, yet her attitude seems to soften as Will becomes more assertive and independent. Perhaps respect and affection are augmented by pride as she sees the results of her labours.

As a result of Maggie’s cunning intervention, Henry is left with no real choice and is forced to provide financial settlements for his younger daughters’ marriages, and to recognise the value of Will’s contribution to his business. With Will, he forms what amounts to a commercial union between capitalist management and skilled workforce, with each element receiving recognition for the value of their input. Perhaps Brighouse saw this formula as something business ventures across the country could aspire to…

Sharply and knowingly directed by David Lean, “Hobson’s Choice” is beautifully acted by all involved but particular credit must go to Charles Laughton who manages to maintain audience sympathy for the very character who is also the target of derision, and John Mills who conveys innocence, vulnerability and nascent self-respect with consummate ease and charm.

 

My thanks for taking the time to read this article. I hope you found it of some value.

Stuart Fernie (stuartfernie@yahoo.co.uk)

 

BLOG                                         YouTube