Reflections
on characters and themes in “The Banshees of Inisherin”,
from an existential perspective
Written
and directed by Martin McDonagh
Starring
Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, Kerry Condon and Barry Keoghan
Set on a small island off
the coast of Ireland toward the end of the Irish civil war, “The Banshees of
Inisherin” recounts the tale of musician Colm’s attempts to terminate his
life-long friendship with unsophisticated dairy farmer Padraic. Heartbroken and
unable to understand or accept Colm’s sudden change of heart, Padraic persists
in trying to rekindle their friendship with dramatic and life-changing
consequences.
In my opinion, “Banshees”
is first and foremost an existential drama about the conflict between personal freedom
and coexistence. It may be playful and comical in places but fundamentally it
explores existential themes such as the lack of moral imperative, the effect of
the inevitability of death, the desire to do something worthwhile despite (or
perhaps because of) the apparent pointlessness of life, the impact our actions
and very existence have on others, and the responsibility we may feel for that
impact which conflicts with our right to exercise freedom, in this case the
freedom to break off a long-term relationship.
Colm has arrived at the outlook-shifting
conclusion that his days are numbered and he wishes to do something worthwhile
with his remaining time, so he decides to focus on composing music. What he
does not want to do is spend any more time with Padraic who, he has concluded,
is dull and offers no stimulation or help in his new-found preoccupation with
doing something rewarding rather than indulge in idle and wasteful (as he sees
it) chatter.
While Colm is
intelligent, reflective and has turned his mind to thoughts of achievement and legacy,
Padraic is a simple soul content to live out his time in emotional security and
unthinking happiness. However, Colm is direct to the point of brutality in
informing Padraic of his decision to no longer speak to him or have anything
more to do with him, and this causes Padraic considerable pain and heartache.
Colm is exercising his personal
freedom to do and act as he wishes, as he is entirely entitled to do, but he fails
to take into account the impact of his actions on his one-time friend. He
clearly feels that Padraic should simply accept his change of mind and move on
but Colm’s influence is so embedded in Padraic’s life that Padraic cannot
fathom life without his friend and this rejection causes him profound emotional
and perhaps psychological distress as this social and emotional anchor is weighed
from his life.
According to the precepts
of existentialism, Colm should not harm another to achieve his goal but there
is nothing to say he can’t harm himself in the pursuance of that aim, in the
hope that Padraic will concede for fear of indirectly causing harm to Colm.
This ingenious existential ploy does somewhat suggest hypocrisy and manipulation
on Colm’s part as he casually abandons any feelings he might have had for
Padraic but depends on Padraic’s continued feelings for him to achieve his goal
of ridding himself of Padraic.
In a tragic way, Padraic
grows and develops. He learns to think beyond the immediate as a result of
encountering pain, negativity and distrust. As a result of Colm’s attitude and
actions, Padraic goes from innocent and happy-go-lucky to bitter and vengeful.
He is overwhelmed by hurt, disappointment, insecurity and a newly-felt sense of
nothingness.
Colm rejected the
innocent and shallow Padraic as unworthy of his friendship and esteem but, at
the end of the film, Colm appears to have gained a degree of respect and
perhaps even fear for the new unforgiving Padraic created, ironically, by Colm’s
own actions. Thus, Colm comes to see and feel the consequences of his actions
and ambition on others.
Death is frequently
referred to in the course of the film as regretful and final. There is no real
question of spiritual survival or even satisfaction at a life well spent. Colm
has suffered bouts of despair or depression, perhaps as a result of
contemplation of his life and a lack of a sense of achievement which leads, of
course, to his fateful decision regarding Padraic. Colm even tells Siobhan he
fears he is only entertaining himself until the inevitable and asks if she
doesn’t feel the same. Clearly, he has questions about the point of his life
and has broadened his concerns to incorporate everyone.
When faced with Colm’s
aspirations to achievement and worth, compared to the dullness and mediocrity
of Padraic and his like, Siobhan points out they are all boring little men even
if they try to convince themselves they are doing something worthwhile. Perhaps
Siobhan has shared these existential thoughts but opts not to dwell on them.
She will put the past behind her, leave the island to start afresh and make an
effort to make the most of her life.
I suspect the action and
themes may also be viewed as an allegory for the causes and divisions in the
Irish civil war, with some happy to accept the status quo while others wished
to develop and evolve, and our film shows how such differences of opinion can
evolve into deep-felt matters of principle and grudge.
Officer Kearney enforces “law
and order” by force and bullying rather than reason and understanding and that
is how he has brought up his son Dominic, an apparently simple soul who is
remarkably insightful if socially inept but is deprived of love, affection and
respect. Kearney’s parenting skills, or lack of them, impact Dominic, in this
case quite literally, and it is only when it is too late that Kearney realises
his feelings for his son and perhaps the responsibility he bears for his
development and fate. Time is of the essence in terms of achieving clarity of
vision and understanding regarding relationships and responsibility, and
ensuring the avoidance of regret and guilt.
I wonder if Kearney may
also be viewed as representative of historical authority in Ireland, resorting
to force and violence to ensure compliance, while his offspring may be viewed
as something of a misfit, denied affection and acceptance by society at large.
Although most of the
characters are seen attending church and Colm even confesses his sins, religion
does not appear to hold any sway over events. Indeed, when Colm and the priest disagree,
ending in a bad-tempered argument, this may suggest that the influence of religion
amounts to no more than an exchange of views between two people.
Martin McDonagh tells
this sorry and thought-provoking tale with emotional engagement, clear
characterisation and development and, amazingly, with no small amount of humour
to lighten the dramatic intensity and make the whole more involving and
palatable.
In terms of acting, I
thought all involved acquitted themselves admirably with varied, engaging and
intelligent performances.
It may not be everyone’s
cup of tea but I found this film stimulating, beguiling and thoroughly
entertaining.
My thanks for taking the
time to read this article. I hope you found it of some value.
Stuart Fernie (stuartfernie@yahoo.co.uk)
Blog YouTube
No comments:
Post a Comment